What the papers said 16 April 2018
President Emmanuel Macron was on television on Sunday, and he’s all over the papers.
Le Monde, Le Figaro and Libération all give the front-page honours to the president, aggressively interviewed on television for about two and a half hours on Sunday.
It has been a busy week for Macron, with a lunchtime chat last Thursday on TF1, followed by Sunday’s far more muscular confrontation with Jean-Jacques Bourdin of BFMTV and Edwy Plenel of the news website Mediapart.
The president is approaching the end of his first year at the helm and chose a Paris theatre as the venue for this interview, with the Eiffel Tower as background. The man, as we have come to realise, is fond of symbols.
He's probably not so fond of yesterday's interrogators, Bourdin and Plenel.
The two men tried to tear into the president like a pair of famished ferrets. The questions were, says Le Monde, frequently abrupt and forced the head of state on several occasions to reproach the ferrets for their "tendentious approach", even accusing them of being tub-thumpers and demagogues.
The president was anxious to present himself as a man who listens to the various national ex
"My aim," he stressed, "is to bring the country together. But that can't be done by refusing to change things and by giving in to the tyranny of certain minorities."
Eleven months after taking the top job, Macron refuses to accept the idea that the various disgruntled groups are converging in a sort of national wave of discontent. He remains determined to enforce deep structural changes in both the private sector and the public services.
He insists that he's just following the recipe laid out in his election programme.
Fighting president fails to land big punches
Left-leaning Libération says the president was in fighting form but found him pugnacious rather than convincing.
Libé's editorial is devoted to the question of the allied air strikes against a number of targets in Syria, to which much of Sunday’s television interview with the leader was devoted.
Libération says the reactions of the mainstream-right Republicans, far right and hard left prove that the credibility of Marine Le Pen, Jean-Luc Mélenchon and Laurent Wauquiez on questions of foreign affairs is close to zero.
Le Pen has cast doubt on the claims that a chemical weapons attack took place.
Mélenchon has deplored a military action undertaken "without proof".
Such an attitude, says Libé, runs in the face of evidence from independent observers and from humanitarian workers on the ground in Eastern Ghouta. It is also easy to forget earlier chemical attacks by the Assad regime against civilians, attacks which have since been confirmed by UN inspection teams.
As for the right-wing Republicans party, critics of an action which they claim has simply added "war to the war", Libé says Friday's attacks apparently killed no one and were against chemical weapons installations only.
The allied action was intended to sanction obvious infringements of international law, it argues, and to send a message to Assad's chief supporter, Russian President Vladimir Putin, that a negotiated political settlement of the Syrian disaster is long overdue.
Those who criticise Friday's action by implicitly calling for further inaction in the face of barbarity have, says Libé, a grave responsibility.
A useless waste of time
Le Figaro's editorial on the presidential TV talk show is headlined "Useless".
Le Figaro finds the atmosphere was more boxing match than debate. The underlying determination was to present a leader who is a warmonger, a friend of the rich, an accomplice of the tax evader.
It should have been a critical look-back on a year in power. In fact it was a waste of time, the right-wing paper concludes.
This is a translation of President Macron’s letter to the public in full.…
Media and press freedom advocates have denounced a number of attacks and threats…
On Saturday a huge gas explosion in Paris killed two members of the public and two…